Antibacterial Agent in Some Asthma Medications Linked to Airway Constriction
January 2001
A new University of Florida study provides fresh evidence that an
antibacterial agent added to some asthma medications can cause
airway constriction, potentially blunting the effectiveness of efforts
to reverse an asthma attack.
The chemical benzalkonium chloride, or BAC, is added to some
albuterol solutions given by nebulizer, the device most frequently
used to try to reverse acute episodes of breathing problems in
children under 6. Prescribed for people of all ages, albuterol is
considered the most effective medicine for quickly opening the
airways. BAC is not added to albuterol administered by
metered-dose inhaler, the device typically used by older children
and adults.
UF College of Pharmacy researchers found that 10 of 18 adults
with asthma experienced a significant drop in breathing capacity
when exposed to the preservative during their experiment. They
published findings from their study in the January issue of the
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
The researchers are calling on parents and health-care
professionals to choose products that do not contain BAC.
"We suggest that it's illogical to use a preservative that may
counteract the effect of albuterol - the main medicine that you have
to reverse an asthma attack," said Dr. Michael J. Asmus, an
assistant professor of pharmacy practice and lead author of the
journal article. "Some people might argue that albuterol is a very
powerful medicine and wonder how the small effect of the BAC
preservative could matter," he said. "But the potential is that
people having asthma attacks won't get relief from their rescue
medicine, possibly leading to the need for hospitalization and
aggressive treatment."
The UF research is the latest experiment to show the airway
constriction effects of BAC. Richard Beasley of the Wellington
School of Medicine first described problems with BAC in studies in
the 1980s.
In the UF experiment, research participants were given up to four
600 microgram doses of BAC, spaced 20 minutes apart. The idea
was to mimic the maximum amount of BAC patients would inhale
in an albuterol nebulizer solution under emergency department
guidelines for reversing an acute asthma attack.
After inhaling one dose, three participants experienced more than
a 20 percent drop in their ability to force air out of their lungs, while
seven others - including one whose capacity dropped 47 percent --
showed such declines after the second or third dose. So that the
research participants' safety would not be endangered, no further
doses of BAC were given once a 20 percent drop was observed. At
that level, people begin to sense chest discomfort.
The authors noted that they have not tested a combination of
albuterol and BAC, so it's not clear precisely how much the
medicine's effectiveness would be limited by the additive.
"There have been case reports, however, of the medicine not
working at all in some people," said Dr. Leslie Hendeles, a UF
professor of pharmacy practice and a clinical pharmacist in the
College of Medicine's pediatric pulmonary division. "When such
patients have been given albuterol with BAC, their asthma attacks
have just gotten worse."
The U.S. market for asthma medications is huge and growing as
the number of people with the lung disease continues to climb. An
estimated 17 million people have asthma, according to the
American Lung Association.
Originally, pharmaceutical companies added BAC to albuterol to
battle bacterial growth in containers that held many doses of the
drug and therefore would be opened repeatedly, exposing the
medicine to contamination. But the amount of BAC in those
containers was low, limiting their potential for causing airway
constriction, Asmus said.
When some single-dose containers were introduced later, they
contained the same amount of BAC as the multidose bottle -
thereby exposing patients to 300 micrograms of BAC per dose
rather than 50, Asmus said.
Hendeles said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not
shown interest in asking or requiring companies to remove BAC
from their products. "It has not been easy to get attention to this
issue because it can be difficult to determine whether patients in
the midst of an asthma attack are failing to respond to treatment
because their asthma is so severe or because the treatment itself
is compromised by the presence of BAC," Hendeles said.
Now on the market are some single-dose formulations for the
nebulizer that do not contain BAC. The antibacterial is not needed
because the albuterol solution is prepared in accordance with
sterile filling procedures, Asmus said. One of these products is
manufactured by California-based Dey L.P., which supported the
UF study with grant funds. Hendeles serves on the company's
pharmacy advisory board.
Asmus said he was not surprised by their findings and pointed out
the round of experiments actually had been designed to test
another preservative, edetate disodium or EDTA. The
pharmaceutical company Dey uses that preservative to prevent
discoloration of one of its albuterol products.
All of the research participants took part in the three arms of the
study, in which they were exposed on different days to BAC,
EDTA or a saline solution that served as a placebo. The
participants experienced little if any declines in breathing capacity
following EDTA. Two participants reacted to the placebo, with one
experiencing a 23 percent decline after a single dose and the
second experiencing a 22 percent drop after the fourth dose.
The UF researchers are seeking to spread the word to physicians,
nurses, pharmacists and parents about the possibility that BAC
can limit the effectiveness of albuterol or even worsen an attack. If
BAC is present in a medicine, manufacturers must list it on the
label but do not have to indicate the amount.